Latvia Considers Stricter Vaping Regulations in Public Spaces Following EU Recommendations

Latvia Electronic Cigarette Tax Increase

Ministry of Health Plans to Propose Ban on E-Cigarette Use from Residential Building Windows and Other Public Areas

Latvia may introduce more stringent rules on the use of electronic smoking devices in public places, following new recommendations adopted by the European Union (EU). The Ministry of Health plans to propose further restrictions, including a ban on using e-cigarettes from the windows of residential buildings, according to a report by Latvian Radio on December 10.

EU Council Calls for Expanded Restrictions

The Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (EPSCO) has urged member states to extend restrictions on public exposure to both tobacco smoke and vapors from electronic smoking devices. Latvia currently prohibits smoking cigarettes and using e-cigarettes on balconies, staircases, train platforms, bus shelters, educational establishments, workplaces, and other public areas. The proposed changes would extend the ban to include using e-cigarettes from windows in residential homes, work environments, public places, and catering establishments.

Artjoms Uršuļskis (New Unity), Parliamentary Secretary at the Ministry of Health, explains the planned regulations: “We should regulate what happens to smoking from windows – whether it is tobacco or vapor – because we have a regulation on balconies, but we might need to work on residential (house) windows. But the main idea is to protect the public not only from tobacco smoke but also from vapor.”

Opinions from Experts

The Smokefree Industry Association opposes the Council of Ministers’ recommendation, arguing that it is disproportionate and could cause more problems than benefits. Marita Jansone, Executive Director of the Association, points out that Latvia already has extensive restrictions on smoking, including smokeless products, in both public and private environments. She emphasizes that these restrictions are often neither respected nor enforced, and calls for reflection on the need for and proportionality of additional restrictions to avoid declaratory bans that are not monitored and enforced.

However, Jansone stresses that the Association understands and supports the right of non-smokers to be in a smoke-free environment. The Association recommends creating specific areas for the exclusive use of smoke-free products outdoors or in workplaces that are inaccessible to cigarette smokers. Jansone also argues that the use of smokeless devices or their vapors does not pose a risk of passive smoking, but rather serves as a less harmful alternative to smoking traditional cigarettes.

Alvils Krams, a pneumonologist and the chief specialist in pneumonology at Riga East Clinical University Hospital, disagrees with the Association’s stance. He warns that passive smoking affects health and that e-cigarettes are being used by increasingly younger people. Krams stresses that everything inhaled is toxic, whether it is smoke from conventional cigarettes or vapor from electronic cigarettes. “Of course, the process is slightly different – one is the high-temperature vaporization process and the other is the combustion process. But there are a lot of toxic substances and carcinogens,” he says.

Edgars Rudzītis, deputy chief of the Riga municipal police, reports that the police conduct checks in places where people gather, near educational institutions, and in entertainment venues. He notes that citizens are quite active in reporting smokers who do not respect the rules. According to Riga municipal police, approximately 600 reports of smoking have been received this year, including reports of underage smoking, smoking in stairwells and balconies of apartment buildings, and smoking in unauthorized places.

While the timeline for implementing the European Commission’s recommendations remains uncertain, the Ministry of Health suggests that the new regulations could come into force as early as next year. As Latvia considers tightening its vaping regulations in public spaces, the ongoing debate highlights the need to balance public health concerns with practical enforcement challenges and the rights of both smokers and non-smokers alike.

Matthew Ma
Follow