‘Big Vape’ on Netflix: Tells the Rise and Fall of Juul

Rise and Fall of Juul

At one point valued at an astonishing $38 billion, e-cigarette maker Juul seemed destined to transform the nicotine industry. But in one of the most stunning falls from grace in recent memory, the company now faces thousands of lawsuits and a decimated reputation.

Netflix’s new four-part documentary series Big Vape: The Rise and Fall of Juul chronicles the company’s meteoric ascent, followed by an equally rapid demise. Through extensive research and insider accounts, it constructs a cautionary tale of innovation without foresight.

Juul’s Beginnings: Well-Intentioned Origins

Long before becoming a household name, Juul started as Ploom – a startup founded in 2007 by James Monsees and Adam Bowen. The Stanford graduate designers originally aimed to provide a safer, cleaner alternative to smoking.

Their first product was a high-end vaporizer, positioned as a sophisticated smoking gadget. Despite rave reviews, sales remained modest. But the lukewarm response only seemed to strengthen their resolve to disrupt the tobacco industry.

After years of iterations, Ploom launched the Pax vaporizer in 2012. Sleek and discreet, it garnered praise as the “iPhone of vapes”. Their revolutionary nicotine salt formula also delivered satisfaction missing from earlier e-cigs.

Buoyed by growing buzz, the company reorganized as PAX Labs in 2015. A year later they unveiled the Juul device and juices based on their patented nicotine salt formula. After modest beginnings, the stage was set for massive growth.

Accelerating Demand: Juul’s Viral Adoption

Juul’s slim, USB-like design and addictively smooth hits instantly attracted vapers. But it was their social media marketing that truly amplified awareness among youth.

PAX recruited influencers and pushed sponsored posts portraying Juul as a lifestyle accessory. Hashtags like #juul and #juulnation exploded, accelerating organic promotion. Suddenly Juul became ubiquitous at high schools and colleges.

Memes portraying Juul tricks went viral on Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube. Seeking acceptance, students flaunted Juul devices costing $35 for the device itself and $16 for a four-pack of cartridge “pods”.

young student using Juul

Juul’s edgy, discreet design perfectly aligned with youth rebelliousness. But behind the meteoric growth lay nicotine levels far exceeding other e-cigs. While framed as an “alternative” to smoking, Juul delivered addictive potency rivaling cigarettes.

Still, by achieving such rapid mass adoption, the company seduced investors. Juul raised over $650 million in funding by early 2018. Their valuation skyrocketed to an outrageous $38 billion as smokers and teens alike became hopelessly addicted. Surely nothing could derail such explosive success?

Gathering Clouds: Early Warnings Go Unheeded

Behind the scenes, warning signs pointing to an impending storm grew. A small cohort of company insiders became increasingly uneasy regarding Juul’s popularity among youth. And soon, outside forces began to take notice as well.

In early 2018, the Surgeon General issued an advisory on youth e-cigarette use, declaring it an “epidemic”. But Juul downplayed concerns, claiming they couldn’t control how consumers used products intended for adult smokers. They resisted calls to curb nicotine levels or restrict flavors attracting teens like fruit medley, creme brulee and mango.

Anti-tobacco activists, health professionals, educators and parents slowly organized against the company. They pressured the FDA to intervene and Congress to investigate. Yet still, Juul continued pumping money into flashy marketing campaigns and lobbying efforts.

Despite the growing backlash, the breakneck pace of Juul sales continued. The company expanded internationally across Europe, Asia and beyond. All signs still pointed towards utter market domination.

But the swelling controversy only enraged their opponents further. By late 2018, a perfect storm was brewing, ready to engulf the once untouchable giant.

Downfall: Regulations & Lawsuits Topple the Giant

The hammer fell in November 2018 when the FDA restricted flavored e-cig sales to age-limited stores. Cracking down further in 2019, they launched investigations into Juul’s marketing practices. But the real death blow came when they reneged Juul’s 2017 claims of safety and put the company under regulatory review.

Staggering under the FDA’s barrage, lawsuits seeking damages for deceptive marketing rained down. By 2019, Juul faced hundreds of personal injury claims, class actions, and probes by state attorneys general. The company pledged to reset its reputation, but the damage was done.

Once glorified as visionaries, Juul’s founders became vilified, summoned to testify before Congress. With legal costs soaring, Altria slashed its $12.8 billion investment in Juul to just $1.6 billion by 2020. Meanwhile, Juul furiously tried restructuring to avoid bankruptcy.

But the bell couldn’t be unrung. Juul’s swift plummet from a $38 billion valuation exemplified Silicon Valley’s “ask forgiveness, not permission” ethos gone wrong. Despite helping millions of adult smokers, the company’s reckless practices ruined vaping’s image.

While still maintaining a market presence, Juul serves as a sobering example of innovation without responsibility. Their stunning trajectory should inspire reflection across all emerging industries.

What ‘Big Vape’ Reveals About Juul’s Epic Rise and Fall

Directed by acclaimed filmmaker R.J. Cutler, Netflix’s Big Vape promises a deep-dive into Juul’s transformational yet destructive impact. Interviews with insiders and experts should provide unprecedented insight into what transpired.

For those intrigued by business successes turned cautionary tales, Big Vape is a must-watch. Expect a thorough examination of how Juul’s founders disrupted tobacco but succumbed to negligent practices.

Ultimately, the series will likely serve as a case study in ethical technology innovation. By tracing Juul’s origins, viral adoption and collapse, Big Vape underscores the importance of considering human impacts, not just profits.

While Juul’s story clearly warrants continued discussion, reliving past mistakes only holds value if used to inform a better future. Perhaps the most important lesson is that true change requires consumer education along with corporate and government accountability.

And on an individual level, we must reconsider how easily viral trends seduce without scrutiny. Popularity alone fails to equate to quality or safety. The Juul saga stands as a prime example of such skewed perspectives – and their power to cause real harm.

By taking an honest look back at Juul’s trajectory, hopefully we can gain wisdom to guide healthier decisions – both as consumers and corporate citizens. While vaping’s long-term impacts remain hotly debated, some critical insights have clearly emerged.

Watch the trailer for Big Vape: The Rise and Fall of Juul above.

Matthew Ma